Hello, I! ̄m new here (looking forward to buying your first book some time next month, and omg do you have reasonable prices on the zafus in you site shop), and to all these things (zen and its community) in general, but I think that may be the right stance for this. Too many details that are irrelevant to the correct response. If life and limb are not at risk, I say that all conflicts should eventually be resolved with kind words. However, we are humans and are not always capable. At bare minimum, it usually takes time to cool off enough to seek reconciliation. Sometimes we never get to that point. What! ̄s important to remember is that you can not blame your enemies for a lack of reconciliation. There is almost always some set of truthful words that could reconcile the deepest conflicts. We must admit to ourselves that regardless of their failings we have either failed to find those words or held too much pride to use them. This is even more difficult in many cases than simply finding and using them. Everyone has their reasons for their behaviors, not all of them logical or moral. One must try to empathize with the failings of others, even when their failings are directed aggressively at our own person. We are best at doing this if we try to understand their motives, but if we can! ̄t understand, we must acknowledge our own ignorance and give them the psychological benefit of the doubt. We may not always be capable of this response (I rarely am), but I believe it to be the correct one. In this case, I find it easier as an observer to keep a clear head by not reading the articles in the first place, but I will say that in the case of the admin, if I ran a site and gave people I knew the ability to post articles on it, I would let them post whatever they wanted as long as I found their postings to be honest. It! ̄s important to let contributors have their freedom. I! ̄m going to stay out of further specifics (as I probably should have there) as I am not qualified to speak on them and feel it muddys the basic issues involved. I only wish I was capable of what feels like such lucidity when I wasn! ̄t half asleep. Looking forward to finally getting your book(s) when I! ̄m less broke, D351.
My question is how long can a person with HIV lives while taking the treatment ? And this change of medication why is it done, why can! ̄t we take one for life time?
I am changing to Atripla what possible side effects can I expect?
Hi, i started using atroiza last year when i founded out im positive and was pregnant. At that time and they made me vomit a lot and i was very dizzy but now it has all gone and i! ̄m fine. I gave birth to a beautiful baby boy who is negative.
Im 50, I found I had HIV , 3 years ago. I take my medication , exercise. Etc but my cd4 seems to have stuck at 144 , will the HIV become aids
My friend tested positive while she was pregnant n his bf tested negative,my freind says they did sex even if she was on her period,she doesn! ̄t how she get infected and how his bf is negative while they do unprotected sex. please clarify
Please order the comments in this page in decrescent time (with the newest on top)!
What I noticed is!-The contestants were just normal in their walk and pose!-
Similar to comment #8 and #9 above, has anyone done any work with parsing the logs? Just to cite the easy example, I think it would be interesting to see how much time is spent per category.
Could you please also send the line-up to me?